"They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house?"
This part of the speech relies on the fallacy of argumentum ad baculum, or the appeal to fear or force. Here, Henry is trying to get the audience's attention by making the extreme, the idea of soldiers in every house, the possible reality if the audience does not do/feel as he does. Thus fallacy pretty much just means that he is relying on his audience's fear as his main point right here. If the audience does not agree to go to war, then there will most definitely be soldiers stationed in every house before there can possibly be any way to free themselves from the British, their oppressors.
However, while this speech does commit several fallacies, it is also true that it is well written, and I can imagine, well delivered. Henry's rhetoric is quite strong, and while he does not back up all of his statements entirely, that does not stop things such as argumentum ad baculum not catching peoples' attention and making them listen. This makes people feel like it maybe was urgent, that it was necessary, and therefore most people don't even realize that it is a fallacy, and that they may not have entirely backed up their statements.
No comments:
Post a Comment